第28节
<TD></TD></TABLE>
xistindependentofreligion
tothissquareanspossibletodisurse
philosophicallynceingeaning
established:thatthereorevague
anduncertainsignification,thanthetentioned;forthat
thereostasnydifferentopinionsnceinghonour,as
neanthetrue
naturalbeautyofvirtue,iaintainityexistindependent
ofanyreligioneveay,”addedhe,”youyourselfwillallow
ityexistindependentofallbutone:soetan,ajew,
andalltheintainersofallthedifferentsectsintheworld”
threplied,thisaliceofall
theeneestothetruechurchhesaid,hedoubtednotbutthatall
theinfidelsandhereticksintheheyuld,
nfinehonourtotheironabledeceptions;
”buthonour,”sayshe,”isnotthereforenifold,becausethereare
nyabsurdopinionsaboutit;norisreligionnifold,becausethere
arevarioussectsandheresiesintheention
religion,ianthechristianreligion;andnotonlythechristian
religion,buttheprotestantreligion;andnotonlytheprotestant
religion,buttheean
thatdeofdivinegraceonlynsistenth,but
dependentupon,thisreligion;andisnsistenthanddependent
uponnootheoean,andh
ean,will
uphold,stlessdictateanuntruth,istoassertanabsurditytoo
shockingtobenceived”
”ipurposelyavoided,”sayssquare,”draonclusionhi
thoughtevidentfrobr >
sureyouhavenotattetedtoanshoodropthearticle
ofreligion,ithinkitisplain,froouhavesaid,thatwe
havedifferentideasofhonour;ore
terofitsexplanationihaveasserted,thattruehonourandtrue
virtuearealstsynonyuster,andtheyarebothfoundedonthe
unalterableruleofright,andtheetealfitnessofthings;toh
anuntruthbeingabsolutelyrepugnantandntrary,itiscertainthat
truehonourcannotsupportanuntruthinthis,therefore,ithink
thatthishonourcanbesaidtobefoundedon
religion,toeantany
positivelaw”
”iagree,”ans,th,”anwho
assertshonourtobeanterallhy,didi
agree”
hevery
ldly,theyhadbothstakenhisaning;forthathehadsaid
nothingoftruehonouritispossible,hohave
easilyquietedthedisputants,,had
notanothertteo,afinalendtothe
nversationatpresent
chapter4
ntaininganecessaryapologyfortheauthor;andachildish
incident,hperhapsrequiresanapologylikewise
beforeiproe
snstructionsintoefeaylead
theforien
inthecauseofvirtueorreligion
ihope,therefore,nonisunderstanding
ofperversionofaning,srepresent,asendeavouringto
annature;and
an,andraise
hibovethebrutecreationthis,reader,iuretosayand
byhouuchthere
e,thatiherhaveburied
thesentintsofthesetealoblivion,thanhave
doneanyinjurytoeitherofthesegloriouscauses
onthentrary,itishavieotheirservice,thatihave
takenupontorerdthelivesandactionsoftheirfalse
andpretendedostdangerous
ene;andihatbothreligionandvirtuehave
rehypocritesthanthetiest
profligatesorinfidelsuldever:nay,farther,as
thesetheirpurity,arerightlycalledthebandsofcivil
society,andareindeedthegreatestofblessings;sowhenpoisoned
andrruptedhfraud,pretence,andeffectation,theyhave
beetheentoperpetrate
thestcruelschiefstotheiroies
indeed,idoubtnotbutthisridiculey
anytrueandjustsentintsoftenca
froheuthsofthesepersons,lesttheaken
together,andishouldbenceivedtoridiculeallalikenohe
readerenwere
fools,theyuldnotbesupposedtohaveholdennonebutwrong
principles,andtohaveutterednothingbutabsurdities;
injustiustihavedootheircharacters,hadi
seleed
sttheirarguntshaveappeared
upontheisnotreligionorvirtue,buttheor
thetoochneglected
virtue,andsquare,religion,inthepositionoftheirseveral
syste,andhadnotbothutterlydiscardedallnaturalgoodnessof
heart,theyhadneverbeenrepresentedastheobjectsofderisionin
thishistory;inheed
thistterthen,entionedinthe
lastchapter,asterblifiland
toones,thensequenceofothe
forr;forthoughsterblifil,nothstandinghehe
younger,atch,yettochhis
superioratthenobleartofboxing
tohoentshthatyouth;
forbesidesthattoyjonesidstallhis
roguery,andreallylovedblifil,thbeingalhesend
ofthelatter,
butanisallhours;itis
thereforenohataboyisnotsoadifferencearisingatplay
betabeggarlybastard
uponepassionateinhisdisposition,
iediatelycausedthatphenononinthef
... </P></TD>
xistindependentofreligion
tothissquareanspossibletodisurse
philosophicallynceingeaning
established:thatthereorevague
anduncertainsignification,thanthetentioned;forthat
thereostasnydifferentopinionsnceinghonour,as
neanthetrue
naturalbeautyofvirtue,iaintainityexistindependent
ofanyreligioneveay,”addedhe,”youyourselfwillallow
ityexistindependentofallbutone:soetan,ajew,
andalltheintainersofallthedifferentsectsintheworld”
threplied,thisaliceofall
theeneestothetruechurchhesaid,hedoubtednotbutthatall
theinfidelsandhereticksintheheyuld,
nfinehonourtotheironabledeceptions;
”buthonour,”sayshe,”isnotthereforenifold,becausethereare
nyabsurdopinionsaboutit;norisreligionnifold,becausethere
arevarioussectsandheresiesintheention
religion,ianthechristianreligion;andnotonlythechristian
religion,buttheprotestantreligion;andnotonlytheprotestant
religion,buttheean
thatdeofdivinegraceonlynsistenth,but
dependentupon,thisreligion;andisnsistenthanddependent
uponnootheoean,andh
ean,will
uphold,stlessdictateanuntruth,istoassertanabsurditytoo
shockingtobenceived”
”ipurposelyavoided,”sayssquare,”draonclusionhi
thoughtevidentfrobr >
sureyouhavenotattetedtoanshoodropthearticle
ofreligion,ithinkitisplain,froouhavesaid,thatwe
havedifferentideasofhonour;ore
terofitsexplanationihaveasserted,thattruehonourandtrue
virtuearealstsynonyuster,andtheyarebothfoundedonthe
unalterableruleofright,andtheetealfitnessofthings;toh
anuntruthbeingabsolutelyrepugnantandntrary,itiscertainthat
truehonourcannotsupportanuntruthinthis,therefore,ithink
thatthishonourcanbesaidtobefoundedon
religion,toeantany
positivelaw”
”iagree,”ans,th,”anwho
assertshonourtobeanterallhy,didi
agree”
hevery
ldly,theyhadbothstakenhisaning;forthathehadsaid
nothingoftruehonouritispossible,hohave
easilyquietedthedisputants,,had
notanothertteo,afinalendtothe
nversationatpresent
chapter4
ntaininganecessaryapologyfortheauthor;andachildish
incident,hperhapsrequiresanapologylikewise
beforeiproe
snstructionsintoefeaylead
theforien
inthecauseofvirtueorreligion
ihope,therefore,nonisunderstanding
ofperversionofaning,srepresent,asendeavouringto
annature;and
an,andraise
hibovethebrutecreationthis,reader,iuretosayand
byhouuchthere
e,thatiherhaveburied
thesentintsofthesetealoblivion,thanhave
doneanyinjurytoeitherofthesegloriouscauses
onthentrary,itishavieotheirservice,thatihave
takenupontorerdthelivesandactionsoftheirfalse
andpretendedostdangerous
ene;andihatbothreligionandvirtuehave
rehypocritesthanthetiest
profligatesorinfidelsuldever:nay,farther,as
thesetheirpurity,arerightlycalledthebandsofcivil
society,andareindeedthegreatestofblessings;sowhenpoisoned
andrruptedhfraud,pretence,andeffectation,theyhave
beetheentoperpetrate
thestcruelschiefstotheiroies
indeed,idoubtnotbutthisridiculey
anytrueandjustsentintsoftenca
froheuthsofthesepersons,lesttheaken
together,andishouldbenceivedtoridiculeallalikenohe
readerenwere
fools,theyuldnotbesupposedtohaveholdennonebutwrong
principles,andtohaveutterednothingbutabsurdities;
injustiustihavedootheircharacters,hadi
seleed
sttheirarguntshaveappeared
upontheisnotreligionorvirtue,buttheor
thetoochneglected
virtue,andsquare,religion,inthepositionoftheirseveral
syste,andhadnotbothutterlydiscardedallnaturalgoodnessof
heart,theyhadneverbeenrepresentedastheobjectsofderisionin
thishistory;inheed
thistterthen,entionedinthe
lastchapter,asterblifiland
toones,thensequenceofothe
forr;forthoughsterblifil,nothstandinghehe
younger,atch,yettochhis
superioratthenobleartofboxing
tohoentshthatyouth;
forbesidesthattoyjonesidstallhis
roguery,andreallylovedblifil,thbeingalhesend
ofthelatter,
butanisallhours;itis
thereforenohataboyisnotsoadifferencearisingatplay
betabeggarlybastard
uponepassionateinhisdisposition,
iediatelycausedthatphenononinthef
... </P></TD>